Survival of non-commercial size Patagonian scallop discarded by the fishery


  • Matías Schwartz Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Mariana Escolar Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Ángel Marecos Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • Susana Herrera Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Ronaldo Díaz Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Javier Villalba Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)
  • Silvana Campodónico Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP)



Zygochlamys patagonica, survival, non-commercial size, discard


The most important benthic fishery in extension and production of the Southwest Atlantic is that of Patagonian scallop (Zygochlamys patagonica). It is exploited by four factory vessels with non-selective bottom trawl nets and processing plant on board. During the selection process the scallops of commercial size (≥ 55 mm total high) are retained and those that do not reach it (< 55 mm TH) are discarded back to the sea. The purpose of this work was to determine the survival level of non-commercial specimens discarded to the sea and the effect of the selection process on board. Non-commercial scallops coming from deck (control) and discard (treatment) were selected. They were classified according to the level of damage and placed in polypropylene bags to be anchored (~ 100 m depth). The bags were retrieved 10 and 54 d after and the amount of live specimens in each one was registered. The highest survival level was observed in individuals without damage or damaged only on the edges; in those with breaks or perforations in the shell the percentage rounded 50%. It was observed that survival decreased as the time of the experiment increased.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Bergmann M, Moore PG. 2001. Mortality of Asterias rubens and Ophiura ophiura discarded in the Nephrops fishery of the Clyde Sea area, Scotland. ICES J Mar Sci. 58: 531-542.

Bremec C, Lasta M, Hernández D. 2004. Survival of Patagonian scallop (Zygochlamys patagonica, King and Broderip, 1832) after the size selection process on commercial fishing vessels. Fish Res. 66: 49-52.

Crowder L, Murawski S. 1998. Fisheries by-catch: implications for management. Fisheries. 23: 8-15.

Davis M. 2002. Key principles for understanding fish by-catch discard mortality. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 59: 1834-1843.

Depestele J, Desender M, Benoît HP, Polet H, Vincx M. 2014. Short-term survival of discarded target fish and non-target invertebrate species in the “eurocutter” beam trawl fishery of the southern North Sea. Fish Res. 154: 82-92.

De Zwaan A, Babarro J, Monari M, Cattani O. 2002. Anoxic survival potential of bivalves: (arte) facts. Comp. Biochem. Physiol A. 131: 615-624.

Escolar M, Schwartz M, Marecos A, Herrera S, Diaz R, Schejter L, Campodónico M, Bremec C. 2014. Estimación del daño ocasionado a los invertebrados bentónicos por el proceso de selección a bordo en buques de la flota comercial de vieira patagónica Inf Invest INIDEP Nº 73/2014. 45 p.

Gruffydd L. 1972. Mortality of scallops on a Manx scallop bed due to fishing. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 52: 449-454.

Hill B, Wassenberg T. 2000. The probable fate of discards from prawn trawlers fishing near coral reefs: a study in the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Fish Res. 48: 277-286.

Jenkins S, Beukers-Stewart B, Brand A. 2001. Impact of scallop dredging on benthic megafauna: a comparison of damage levels in captured and non-captured organisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 215: 297-301.

Jenkins S, Brand A. 2001. The effect of dredge capture on the escape response of the great scallop, Pecten maximus (L.): implications for the survival of undersized discards. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 266: 33-50.

Kaiser M, Spencer B. 1995. Survival of by-catch from a beam trawl. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 126: 31-38.

Kell L, Bromley P. 2004. Implications for current management advice for North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.): Part II. Increased biological realism in recruitment, growth, density-dependent sexual maturation and the impact of sexual dimorphism and fishery discards. J Sea Res. 51: 301-312.

La Coste A, Jalabert F, Malham S, Cueff A, Poulet S. 2001. Stress and stress-induced neuroendocrine changes increase the susceptibility of juvenile oysters (Crassostrea gigas) to Vibrio spendidus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 67: 2304-2309.

Maguire J, Coleman A, Jenkins S, Burnel G. 2001. Effects of dredging on undersized scallops. Fish Res. 56: 155-165.

Maguire J, Jenkins S, Burnell G. 2002. The effects of repeated dredging and speed of tow on undersized scallops. Fish Res. 58: 367-377.

Montgomery J. 2008. Discarding in the Isle of Man Queen Scallop, Aequipecten opercularis, fishery. The effect of on-deck sorting processes upon survival potential of undersized queen scallops [MSc]. Bangor University. 61 p.

Schwartz M, Escolar M, Marecos A, Campodónico S. 2014. Supervivencia de invertebrados bentónicos en la pesquería de vieira patagónica. Inf Invest INIDEP Nº 51/2014. 11 p.

Valero J, Lasta M. 2008. Estimating survival of discarded scallops in the Patagonian scallop fishery: comment on “Survival of Patagonian scallop (Zygochlamys patagonica, King and Broderip, 1832) after the size selection process on commercial fishing vessels”, by Bremec et al. 2004. Fish Res. 90: 313-315.

Veale L, Hill A, Brand A. 2000. An in situ study of predator aggregations on scallop (Pecten maximus (L)), dredge discards using a static time-lapse camera system. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 255: 111-129.

Veale L, Hill A, Hawkins S, Brand A. 2001. Distribution and damage to the by-catch assemblages of the northern Irish Sea scallop dredge fisheries. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 81: 85-96.



How to Cite

Schwartz, M., Escolar, M., Marecos, Ángel, Herrera, S., Díaz, R., Villalba, J. and Campodónico, S. (2020) “Survival of non-commercial size Patagonian scallop discarded by the fishery”, Marine and Fishery Sciences (MAFIS), 32(2), pp. 149–157. doi: 10.47193/mafis.3222019121905.