Mating behavior of Patagonian octopus (Octopus tehuelchus) under laboratory conditions

Authors

  • Mercedes Berrueta Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Paseo Victoria Ocampo Nº 1, Escollera Norte, B7602HSA - Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • Julián A. Desiderio Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Paseo Victoria Ocampo Nº 1, Escollera Norte, B7602HSA - Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • Florencia Agliano Departamento de Ciencias Marinas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Funes 3350, B7602AYL - Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • Andrea Victoria López Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Paseo Victoria Ocampo Nº 1, Escollera Norte, B7602HSA - Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • Eddie O. Aristizabal Abud Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Paseo Victoria Ocampo Nº 1, Escollera Norte, B7602HSA - Mar del Plata, Argentina - Departamento de Ciencias Marinas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Funes 3350, B7602AYL - Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • Nicolás Ortiz Laboratorio de Cefalópodos, Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos (IBIOMAR-CONICET), Blvd. Brown 2915, U9120ACD - Puerto Madryn, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47193/mafis.3312020061807

Keywords:

Octopus tehuelchus, aquaculture, copula, hectocotyle

Abstract

Patagonian octopus (Octopus tehuelchus) is a species that holds an artisanal fishery in the northern area of the Argentine Patagonian coast and has a potential for aquaculture development. This work aimed to characterize the mating behavior of four pairs of Patagonian octopuses under laboratory conditions. Results showed that this species has a complex reproductive behavior. Remarkably, female remained inside her shelter during pre-copula, copulation and intercourse events. Male and female faced by the oral face during sexual intercourse, which lasted 3 to 5 min. The observations will contribute to the better management of the reproductive specimens of the species in captivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Berrueta M, Aristizabal Abud E, Ricci E, Boccanfuso J. 2018a. Avances en el desarrollo de tecnología de producción comercial de juveniles de pulpito Octopus tehuelchus 2016-2017. Inf Ases Transf INIDEP Nº 12/2018. 15 p.

Berrueta M, Radonic M, López A, Desiderio J, Ortiz N. 2018b. Modelo predictivo para la evaluación del estatus reproductivo del pulpito Octopus tehuelchus mediante el uso de la técnica ecográfica. Inf Invest INIDEP Nº 110/2018. 16 p.

Boal JG, Gonzalez SA. 1998. Social behaviour of individual oval squids (Cephalopoda, Teuthoidea, Loliginidae, Sepioteuthis lessoniana) within a captive school. Ethology. 104: 161-178.

Boletzky S, Hanlon RT. 1983. A review of the laboratory maintenance, rearing and culture of cephalopod molluscs. Mem Natl Mus Victoria. 44: 147-187.

Butler-Struben HM, Brophy SM, Johnson NA, Crook RJ. 2018. In vivo recording of neural and behavioral correlates of anesthesia induction, reversal, and euthanasia in cephalopod molluscs. Front Physiol. 9: 109-112.

Caldwell RL, Ross R, Rodaniche A, Huffard CL. 2015. Behavior and body patterns of the larger Pacific striped octopus. PLOS ONE. 10 (8): e0134152.

Fassiano A, Ortiz N, Ríos de Molina MC. 2017. Reproductive status, antioxidant defences and lipid peroxidation in Octopus tehuelchus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) females. J Nat Hist. 51: 2645-2660.

Fiorito G, Affuso A, Anderson DB, Basil J, Bonnaud L, Botta G, Cole A, D’Angelo L, De Girolamo P, Dennison N, Dickel L, et al. 2014. Cephalopods in neuroscience: regulations, research and the 3Rs. Invert Neurosc. 14: 13-36.

Gutiérrez R, Farías A, Yany G, Uriarte I. 2012. Interacciones macho-hembra del pulpo rojo patagónico Enteroctopus megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) durante el comportamiento de apareamiento. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 40: 808-812.

Hanlon RT, Messenger JB. 1996. Cephalopod behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 232 p.

Huffard CL, Caldwell RL, Boneka F. 2008. Mating behavior of Abdopus aculeatus (d’Orbigny 1834) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the wild. Mar Biol. 154: 353-362.

Iribarne O. 1991. Intertidal harvest of the Patagonian octopus, Octopus tehuelchus (d’Orbigny). Fish Res. 12: 375-390.

Krebs JR, Davies NB. 1993. An introduction to behavioural ecology. 3th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. 420 p.

Mangold K. 1987. Reproduction. In: Boyle PR, editor. Cephalopod life cycles: Volume II comparative reviews. London: Academic Press. p. 157-200.

Moynihan M. 1983. Notes on the behavior of Euprymna scolopes (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae). Behaviour. 85: 25-41.

Nabhitabhata J, Nilaphat P, Promboon P, Jaroongpattananon C. 2005. Life cycle of cultured bobtail squid, Euprymna hyllebergi (Nateewathana, 1997). Phuket Mar Biol Cent Res Bull. 66: 351-365.

Narvarte M, González R, Filippo P. 2007. Artisanal mollusk fisheries in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina): An appraisal of the factors contributing to unsustainability. Fish Res. 87: 68-76.

Narvarte M, González R, Fernández M. 2006. Comparison of tehuelchus octopus (Octopus tehuelchus) abundance between an open-access fishing ground and a marine protected area: evidence from a direct development species. Fish Res. 79: 112-119.

Narvarte M, González R, Sica I. 1996. Estado actual de la pesquería de pulpito patagónico Octopus tehuelchus en el Golfo San Matías. Informes Técnicos del Plan de Manejo Integrado de la Zona Costera Patagónica, Puerto Madryn, Argentina. 19. 33 p.

Norman M. 2000. Cephalopods: a world guide. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 318 p.

Pujals MA. 1982. Contribución al conocimiento de la biología de Octopus tehuelchus d’Orbigny (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Acad. Nac. Cs. Serie I - Ciencias. 46: 30-71.

Ré ME. 1998. Pulpos octopódidos (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). In: Boschi EE, editor. El Mar Argentino y sus recursos pesqueros. Tomo 2. Los moluscos de interés pesquero. Cultivos y estrategias reproductivas de bivalvos y equinoideos. Mar del Plata: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP). p. 69-98.

Ré ME. 2008. Cefalópodos. In: Boltovskoy D, editor. Atlas de sensibilidad del mar y la costa. http://geoportal.ddns.net/atlasambiental/index.htm.

Ré ME, Ortiz N. 2011. Cefalópodos capturados en la Campaña “CONCACEN – Noviembre 2009”, B/O Puerto Deseado. VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Malacología. Libro de resúmenes. p. 249.

Rocha F, González A, Segonzac M, Guerra A. 2002. Behavioural observations of the cephalopod Vulcanoctopus hydrothermalis. Cah Biol Mar. 43: 299-302.

Sims DW, Nash JP, Morritt D. 2001. Movements and activity of male and female dogfish in a tidal sea lough: alternative behavioural strategies and apparent sexual segregation. Mar Biol. 139: 1165-1175.

Rodrigues M, Garcí M, Guerra A, Troncoso J. 2009. Mating behavior of the Atlantic bobtail squid Sepiola atlantica (Cephalopoda: Sepiolidae). Vie et Milieu. 59: 271-275.

Storero LP, Narvarte M, González RA. 2012. Reproductive traits of the small Patagonian octopus Octopus tehuelchus. Helgol Mar Res. 66: 651-659.

Storero LP, Ocampo-Reinaldo M, González RA, Narvarte M. 2010. Growth and life span of the small octopus Octopus tehuelchus in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia): three decades of study. Mar Biol. 157: 555-564.

Tsuchiya K, Uzu T. 1997. Sneaker male in octopus. Venus Jap J Malacol. 56: 177-181.

Wells MJ, Wells J. 1972. Sexual displays and mating of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier and O. cyanea Gray and attempts to alter performance by manipulating the glandular condition of the animals. Anim Behav. 20: 293-308.

Wood JB, Kenchington E, O’Dor RK. 1998. Reproduction and embryonic development time of Bathypolypus arcticus, a deep-sea octopod (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). Malacología. 39: 11-19.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

Berrueta, M., Desiderio, J. A., Agliano, F., López, A. V., Aristizabal Abud, E. O. and Ortiz, N. (2020) “Mating behavior of Patagonian octopus (Octopus tehuelchus) under laboratory conditions”, Marine and Fishery Sciences (MAFIS), 33(1), pp. 115–120. doi: 10.47193/mafis.3312020061807.