Estimation of seafood byproducts generated by freezing companies in the Souss-Massa Region, Morocco

Authors

  • Ez-zalmaty Youness Laboratory of Biotechnologies, Specialized Center of Valorization and Technology of Sea Products, National Institute of Fisheries Research (INRH), P.K. 07, Route d’Essaouira, Anza 80000, Agadir, Morocco - Biological Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, P.O. Box: 523, Beni Mellal, Morocco https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0386-1822
    • Fatima Bellali Biological Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, P.O. Box: 523, Beni Mellal, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-5330
      • Maainia Saadani Laboratory of Biotechnologies, Specialized Center of Valorization and Technology of Sea Products, National Institute of Fisheries Research (INRH), P.K. 07, Route d’Essaouira, Anza 80000, Agadir, Morocco - Biological Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, P.O. Box: 523, Beni Mellal, Morocco
        • Meriem Kharroubi Laboratory of Biotechnologies, Specialized Center of Valorization and Technology of Sea Products, National Institute of Fisheries Research (INRH), P.K. 07, Route d’Essaouira, Anza 80000, Agadir, Morocco

          DOI:

          https://doi.org/10.47193/mafis.4012027010102

          Keywords:

          Seafood byproducts, freezing industry, valorization, circular economy, material flow analysis

          Abstract

          The seafood processing industry generates substantial quantities of byproducts that remain underutilized despite their potential for recovery and further utilization. This study aimed to assess the generation and management of seafood byproducts within the freezing industry of the Souss-Massa region, Morocco. A voluntary semi-structured survey was conducted among 21 of the 39 regional freezing companies, focusing on raw material supply, processing activities, byproduct generation, and management practices. Following post-stratification to the regional frame of 39 freezing companies, the estimated annual processed volume was approximately 70,230 t, generating an estimated 22,504 t of seafood byproducts, corresponding to approximately 32% of the processed raw material. Byproduct generation varied according to species and product type, with Sardina pilchardus, Trachurus trachurus, Merluccius merluccius, and Loligo vulgaris contributing the largest estimated quantities. Viscera (29%), heads (28%), and bones and tails (21%) were dominant byproduct fractions, while shells and carapaces, skin, and trimmings accounted for smaller proportions. The companies surveyed reported several management routes, including fishmeal production, animal feed, external management channels, and direct sales. These findings provide a regional inventory of seafood byproduct streams that may be considered for future valorization. Their technical, economic, and environmental feasibility requires further assessment through approaches such as techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA).

          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.

          References

          Aboudamia FZ, Aatab F, Jaouad A, Bouchdoug M, Kharroubi M. 2022. Sardine scales: a promising source of marine biomaterials. Lett Appl NanoBioScience. 11 (4): 3954-3960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS114.39543960

          Aboudamia FZ, Kharroubi M, Neffa M, Aatab F, Hanoune S, Bouchdoug M, Jaouad A. 2020. Potential of discarded sardine scales (Sardina pilchardus) as chitosan sources. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 70 (11): 1186-1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1813840

          Boudad D, Ziali H, Jrhirid S, This M, Ait Lahcen L. 2025. Digitalisation de la logistique dans le secteur halieutique marocain: état des lieux et perspectives. Rev Int Chercheur. 6 (2): 299-315.

          Caruso G. 2015. Fishery wastes and byproducts: a resource to be valorised. J Fish Sci. 9 (4): 80-83.

          Cassol GZ, Rezende-de-Souza JH, Savay-da-Silva LK. 2025. Fish byproducts as a protein source: a critical review of fish protein concentrate. Food Rev Int. 41 (1): 201-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2024.2392154

          Cooney R, de Sousa DB, Fernández-Ríos A, Mellett S, Rowan N, Morse AP, Hayes M, Laso J, Regueiro L, Wan AHL, et al. 2023. A circular economy framework for seafood waste valorisation to meet challenges and opportunities for intensive production and sustainability. J Clean Prod. 392: 136283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136283

          Coppola D, Lauritano C, Esposito FP, Riccio G, Rizzo C, de Pascale D. 2021. Fish waste: from problem to valuable resource. Mar Drugs. 19 (2): 116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020116

          [DPM] Département de la Pêche Maritime. 2023a. Rapport d’activité 2023. Rabat (Morocco): Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forêts.

          [DPM] Département de la Pêche Maritime. 2023b. La mer en chiffres: année 2023. Rabat (Morocco): Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forêts.

          Elhiss S, Hamdi A, Chahed L, Boisson-Vidal C, Majdoub H, Bouchemal N, Laschet J, Kraiem J, Le Cerf D, Maaroufi RM, et al. 2024. Hyaluronic acid from bluefin tuna byproduct: structural analysis and pharmacological activities. Int J Biol Macromol. 264 (1): 130424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130424

          Erasmus VN, Kadhila T, Gabriel NN, Thyberg KL, Ilungu S, Machado T. 2021. Assessment and quantification of Namibian seafood waste production. Ocean Coast Manag. 199: 105402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105402.

          [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2000. Conversion factors: landed weight to live weight. Revision 1. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 847. 176 p.

          [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022. La situation mondiale des pêches et de l’aquaculture 2022: vers une transformation bleue. Rome: FAO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461fr

          [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2024. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024: Blue Transformation in action. Rome: FAO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cd0683en

          Felician FF, Xia C, Qi W, Xu H. 2018. Collagen from marine biological sources and medical applications. Chem Biodivers. 1 (5): e1700557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201700557

          Ge B, Wang H, Li J, Liu H, Yin Y, Zhang N, Qin S. 2020. Comprehensive assessment of Nile tilapia skin (Oreochromis niloticus) collagen hydrogels for wound dressings. Mar Drugs. 18 (4): 178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md18040178

          Hassoun A, Cropotova J, Trollman H, Jagtap S, Garcia-Garcia G, Parra-López C, Nirmal N, Özogul F, Bhat Z, Aït-Kaddour A, et al. 2023. Use of Industry 4.0 technologies to reduce and valorize seafood waste and byproducts: a narrative review on current knowledge. Curr Res Food Sci. 6:100505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100505.

          Honrado A, Miguel M, Ardila P, Beltrán JA, Calanche JB. 2024. From waste to value: fish protein hydrolysates as a technological and functional ingredient in human nutrition. Foods. 13 (19): 3120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13193120

          Kharroubi M, Bellali F, Karrat A, Bouchdoug M, Jaouad A. 2021. Preparation of Teucrium polium extract-loaded chitosan-sodium lauryl sulfate beads and chitosan-alginate films for wound dressing application. AIMS Public Health. 8 (4): 754-775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2021059

          Little RJA. 1993. Post-stratification: a modeler’s perspective. J Am Stat Assoc. 88 (423): 1001-1012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10476368

          Mkadem H, Kaanane A. 2024. A comprehensive review on marine byproducts use for the recovery of value-added products. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 50: 100972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100972

          Nawaz A, Li E, Irshad S, Xiong Z, Xiong H, Shahbaz HM, Siddique F. 2020. Valorization of fisheries byproducts: challenges and technical concerns to food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. 99:34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.022

          Nejjari S, Elyousfi H. 2023. The blue economy in the new development model: the case of Morocco. In: 2023 International Interdisciplinary PhD Workshop (IIPhDW). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IIPhDW54739.2023.10124417

          Nikoo M, Regenstein JM, Haghi Vayghan A, Walayat N. 2023. Formation of oxidative compounds during enzymatic hydrolysis of byproducts of the seafood industry. Processes. 11 (2): 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020543

          Prelipcean AM, Iosageanu A, Gaspar-Pintiliescu A, Moldovan L, Craciunescu O, Negreanu-Pirjol T, Negreanu-Pirjol B, Mitran RA, Marin M, D’Amora U. 2022. Marine and agro-industrial byproducts valorization intended for topical formulations in wound healing applications. Materials (Basel). 15 (10): 3507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15103507

          Silotry Naik A, Suryawanshi D, Kumar M, Waghmare R. 2021. Ultrasonic treatment: a cohort review on bioactive compounds, allergens and physico-chemical properties of food. Curr Res Food Sci. 4: 470-477.

          Suresh PV, Kudre TG, Johny LC. 2018. Sustainable valorization of seafood processing byproduct/discard. In: Singhania RR, Agarwal RA, Kumar RP, Sukumaran RK, editors. Waste to Wealth. Singapore: Springer. p. 111-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7431-8_7

          Valliant R. 1993. Poststratification and conditional variance estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 88 (421): 89-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10594298

          Venugopal V. 2021. Valorization of seafood processing discards: bioconversion and bio-refinery approaches. Front Sustain Food Syst. 5: 611835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.611835

          Younis AM, Hanafy S, Elkady EM, Alluhayb AH, Alminderej FM. 2024. Assessment of health risks associated with heavy metal contamination in selected fish and crustacean species from Temsah Lake, Suez Canal. Sci Rep. 14: 18706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69561-7

          Yusoff MA, Mohammadi P, Ahmad F, Sanusi NA, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Vatanparast H, Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M. 2024. Valorization of seafood waste: a review of life cycle assessment studies in biorefinery applications. Sci Total Environ. 952: 175810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175810

          Zou Y, Mao Z, Zhao C, Fan Z, Yang H, Xia A, Zhang X. 2024. Fish skin dressing for wound regeneration: a bioactive component review of omega-3 PUFAs, collagen and ECM. Int J Biol Macromol. 283 (3): 137831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137831

          Downloads

          Published

          2026-10-05

          How to Cite

          Youness, E.- zalmaty, Bellali, F., Saadani, M., & Kharroubi, M. (2026). Estimation of seafood byproducts generated by freezing companies in the Souss-Massa Region, Morocco. Marine and Fishery Sciences (MAFIS), 40(1). https://doi.org/10.47193/mafis.4012027010102