MARINE AND FISHERY SCIENCES 35 (3): 437-444 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.47193/mafis.3532022010905
ABSTRACT. Six new records of the bull shark Carcharhinus leucas from five different river
basins of Sumatra, Indonesia, were reported as a result of captures by artisanal and recreational fish-
ers, including records from rivers of northern and western Sumatra for the first time. These findings
may highlight the importance of Sumatran river basins for the reproduction of this threatened species
in Indonesian waters. Inland records of C. leucas in Southeast Asia and in particular Indonesia are
scarce but important for nature conservation purposes and sustainable future fishery management.
Key words: Biogeography, Carcharhinidae, elasmobranchs, freshwaters, conservation, data-poor
area.
Nuevos registros continentales del tiburón toro Carcharhinus leucas de Sumatra, Indonesia
RESUMEN. Se reportaron por primera vez seis nuevos registros del tiburón toro Carcharhinus
leucas en cinco cuencas fluviales diferentes de Sumatra, Indonesia, como resultado de las capturas
de pescadores artesanales y deportivos, incluidos registros de ríos del norte y oeste de Sumatra.
Estos hallazgos resaltan la importancia de las cuencas de los ríos de Sumatra para la reproducción
de esta especie amenazada en aguas de Indonesia. Los registros continentales de C. leucas en el Sud-
este Asiático y, en particular, en Indonesia, son escasos pero importantes para la conservación de la
naturaleza y la gestión pesquera sostenible en el futuro.
Palabras clave: Biogeografía, Carcharhinidae, elasmobranquios, agua dulce, conservación, área
con datos escasos.
The Indonesian Archipelago can be considered as a data-poor area, as there
is currently no systematic study on the status of its shark populations (Jaiteh
et al. 2017). Although the Malay Archipelago has been identified as a hotspot
of elasmobranch biodiversity, containing about 30% of the more than one
thousand shark and ray species in the world (Last and Stevens 2009), this
region remains poorly investigated and a major blind spot for conservation.
This lack of knowledge can be understood as a lack of concerted research
effort on both marine and non-marine elasmobranchs in Indonesia, due to
financial limited research support and logistical difficulties in conducting
research in remote, hard-to-access, and politically unstable areas rather than
a lack of interest on this topic.
437
*Correspondence:
peter.gausmann@rub.de
Received: 30 May 2022
Accepted: 7 July 2022
ISSN 2683-7595 (print)
ISSN 2683-7951 (online)
https://ojs.inidep.edu.ar
Journal of the Instituto Nacional de
Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero
(INIDEP)
This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International License
Marine and
Fishery Sciences
MAFIS
NOTE
New inland records of the bull shark Carcharhinus leucas from Sumatra,
Indonesia
PETER GAUSMANN1, * and VERYL HASAN2
1Working Group Biogeography and Landscape Ecology, Department of Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Ruhr University Bochum,
Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 - Bochum, Germany. 2Fisheries and Marine Faculty, Aquaculture Department, Airlangga University, 60115 -
Surabaya, Indonesia. ORCID Peter Gausmann https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-7349, Veryl Hasan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5457-9335
Several shark species utilize specific inshore
locations (coastal embayments, estuaries, river
mouths) as nursery areas, but only a few elasmo-
branchs are euryhaline, able to transition
between marine and freshwater environments for
prolonged periods (Thorson 1972; Pillans et al.
2009). Carcharhinus leucas (Valenciennes,
1839), the bull shark, is a circumglobal, euryha-
line apex predator widespread in the coastal
areas of the tropical, subtropical, and warm-tem-
perate regions of all ocean basins (Compagno
1984; Last and Stevens 2009; Ebert et al. 2021;
Gausmann 2021). This species relies on low
salinity habitats for reproduction and in the early
stages of its life cycle (Thorson 1976). Rivers
and river mouths can be considered as important
nursery grounds for neonate, young-of-the-year,
and juvenile bull sharks, as they provide low-
mortality habitats and large amounts of suitable
food items (Heupel and Simpfendorfer 2011;
Matich and Heithaus 2015; Pillans et al. 2020).
Carcharhinus leucas has been reported histori-
cally from major streams of the world thousands
of kilometers inland (Gausmann 2021). Thus, the
bull shark is currently known as one of the few
shark species that penetrates freshwater for
extended periods due to its osmoregulatory com-
petencies (Pillans et al. 2005). Grant et al. (2019)
reviewed the use of non-marine habitats by elas-
mobranchs and produced a classification of elas-
mobranchs using freshwater based on the impor-
tance of freshwater habitats on the life history of
each species. According to these authors, only 4
shark species, 3 Glyphis spp. and C. leucas, can
be considered truly euryhaline. In the Indo-Pacif-
ic region, bull sharks are born at 60 to 75 cm
total length (TL), both males and females reach-
ing maturity at 10-20 years and 180 to 230 cm
TL and reaching a maximum recorded size of
400 cm TL (Wintner et al. 2002; Last and
Stevens 2009; McCord and Lamberth 2009).
Carcharhinus leucas is assessed as Vulnerable
(VU) on a global scale in the IUCN Red List
(Rigby et al. 2021).
Carcharhinus leucas is currently recognized
from Sumatra in available distribution maps
(Ebert et al. 2021; Gausmann 2021; Rigby et al.
2021). Only few verified inland records of juve-
niles and subadults from Sumatran freshwater
environments had been previously reported
(Batang Hari River Basin: Tan and Lim 1998;
Musi River: Iqbal et al. 2019). Carcharhinus leu-
cas is know from both marine and freshwater
Indonesian habitats (Gausmann 2021), but there
are gaps in the distribution due to a lack of veri-
fied records for many parts of Indonesia. Some of
the freshwater records of C. leucas from Indone-
sia are quite old (Boeseman 1964) and require
verification. In summary, distributional informa-
tion on C. leucas in Indonesia and Southeast Asia
is scarce (Kottelat 2013; Hasan et al. 2021), and
better information is needed on specific localities
for better management and conservation planning
for this species. The present study aims to report
hints on new potential nursery areas of C. leucas
for conservation purposes, to fill in gaps in the
distribution of this species in Indonesia, and to
outline the benefits of both artisanal and recre-
ational fisheries data to scientific studies.
Herein, catch data on C. leucas from Sumatra
Island, Indonesia, a data-poor area of Southeast
Asia, are summarized (Table 1). Moreover, distri-
butional data of immature bull sharks from Suma-
tra are provided from alternative and inexpensive
existing sources (Figures 1 and 2). The second
author of the present work started a call targeting
Sumatran fishermen to report catches of C. leucas
from riverine habitats for scientific investigation
and to gain distributional data for this species
from a remote region of Indonesia. A systematic
survey of entire towns or regions was not con-
ducted. However, six juvenile to subadult speci-
mens of C. leucas were landed and photographed
by artisanal and recreational fishers in the period
between 2013 and 2019, from five river basins on
Sumatra Island. These sites were located between
4 and 195 km inland from the mouths of these
rivers. Distances of catch sites to the sea were
438 MARINE AND FISHERY SCIENCES 35 (3): 437-444 (2022)
439
GAUSMANN AND HASAN: NEW INLAND RECORDS OF THE BULL SHARK FROM SUMATRA
Table 1. Inland records of Carcharhinus leucas in Sumatran river basins in the period 2013-2019. Numbers refer to locations in Figure 1.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Date of
catch
08.03.2013
07.05.2016
21.06.2017
29.09.2017
26.08.2019
08.09.2019
River
Basin
Buluh
Asahan
Babalan
Musi
Asahan
Indragiri
Water
temperature
(°C)
29-32
29-31
29-30
30-32
28-31
30-32
Province
Sumatera
Barat
(West
Sumatra)
Sumatera
Utara
(North
Sumatra)
Sumatera
Utara
(North
Sumatra)
Sumatera
Selatan
(South
Sumatra)
Sumatera
Utara
(North
Sumatra)
Riau
(East
Sumatra)
Name of village
or town
Padang
Pulau Raja
Pangkalanbrandan
Teluk Kijing
Tanjung Balai
Tembilahan
Coordinates
0° 49'54.4"S,
100° 18'52.7"E
2° 42'20.3"N,
99° 37' 17.6"E
4° 01'47"N,
98° 15'14.0"E
2° 58'58.1"S,
104° 07'47.1"E
2° 58'14.7"N,
99° 47'33.9"E
0° 18'11.7"S,
103° 14'32.2" E
Distance
from
sea/river
mouth
(km)
4
80
11
195
16
44
Used
fishing
gear
Small
hook
(<7/0)
Casting
net
Medium
hook
(>7/0)
Small
hook
(<7/0)
Medium
hook
(>7/0)
Gill net
Estimated
size (cm
total
length)
70
130
75
70
120
70
Life
history
phase and
sex
Juvenile,
female
Subadult,
female
Juvenile
Juvenile,
male
Subadult,
female
Juvenile
measured by using a Geographical Information
System (GIS), although a small inaccuracy
remains. Some of these catches were incidental,
as C. leucas is not a target species for local small-
scale fisheries. Photos of the sharks were volun-
tarily shared with the authors by the fishers and
villagers, who consented to their use in this pub-
lication. The sizes of the reported sharks were
estimated by the authors from the received photo-
graphic material.
While the Asahan, Babalan, Musi, and Indra-
giri rivers drain into the Strait of Malacca and the
South China Sea, the Buluh River drains into the
Indian Ocean (Figure 1). Due to the remote loca-
tion of the catch sites, the only measured water
parameter was temperature, which was obtained
from nearby measuring stations. The five rivers
can be characterized as typical, low- to medium-
impacted lowland rivers of the wet tropics, with
peak discharges during the rainy monsoon season
(November to March) and a period of low flow
when rainfall decreases. Due to larger settlements
along the larger Musi and Indragiri rivers, these
are more polluted than the more pristine Asahan,
Buluh, and Babalan rivers. Catch sites with short
distance to the sea (Table 1, records 1, 3, and 5)
are presumably tidal-influenced but nevertheless
low salinity habitats.
Specimens recovered by fishers were in
acceptable condition, allowing for their identifi-
cation using visible features (blunt snout, small
eyes, lack of an interdorsal ridge, and typical first
to second dorsal fin ratio) cross-referenced with
information in the literature (Garrick 1982; Com-
pagno 1984; Ebert et al. 2013). Similar looking
carcharhinids, such as members of the genus
Glyphis and Lamiopsis were excluded by their
relatively large size of the second dorsal fin in
440 MARINE AND FISHERY SCIENCES 35 (3): 437-444 (2022)
Figure 1. Known records of Carcharhinus leucas in river basins of Sumatra from 2013 to 2019. Numbers refer to Table 1.
200 km
1mi00
© d-maps.com
Strait of
Malacca
Gulf of
Thailand
South
China
Sea
Indian
Ocean
Musi
River
Basin
Indragiri River Basin
River Basin
Batang Hari
Lake
Toba
N
3
5
2
1
6
4
comparison to the first dorsal fin. The similar C.
amboinensis was also excluded by the ratio of the
first to the second dorsal fins that were used to
separate C. leucas (<3.1:1) from C. amboinensis
(>3.1:1). Estimated sizes suggest that specimens
recorded herein were juveniles (70-75 cm TL)
and subadults (120-130 cm TL). Sex was deter-
mined by the presence/absence of claspers. No
specimens were preserved. Some of the captured
specimens were later on sold on the local markets
and some were directly consumed, with no spec-
imens released again.
Sites recorded herein (Figure 1; Table 1)
include the Musi River Basin (n =1), from where
C. leucas had been previously reported by Iqbal
et al. (2019), whereas records from the Asahan
(n =2), Buluh (n =1), Babalang (n =1) and
Indragiri (n =1) rivers are putative new records.
441
GAUSMANN AND HASAN: NEW INLAND RECORDS OF THE BULL SHARK FROM SUMATRA
Figure 2. Selection of photographs of bull shark specimens caught by local fishers in Sumatra. A) Subadult female of Carcharhi-
nus from the Asahan River, North Sumatra (Table 1: record 2). B) Juvenile of C. leucas from the Babalan River, North
Sumatra (Table 1: record 3). C) Local fisher holding a subadult female C. leucas from the Asahan River, North Sumatra
(Table 1: record 5). D) Underside of C. leucas specimen in D. E) Juvenile male C. leucas from the Musi River, South
Sumatra (Table 1: record 4). F) Recreational fisherman holding juvenile C. leucas was captured in the Indragiri River,
Riau, East Sumatra (Table 1: record 6).
AB
CD
EF
Moreover, the present records of C. leucas from
North Sumatra (Asahan River) and West Sumatra
(Buluh River) represent first records for these
regions. Reported specimens were representative
of different life history stages of C. leucas from
juveniles to subadults, with juveniles dominating
(Figure 2). The farthest freshwater penetration
was that in the Musi River, the largest of the five
rivers (~750 km length), at approximately 195
km from the sea (Figure 1; Table 1).
Reports by fishers to scientists can be a valu-
able toolkit for the identification of crucial habi-
tats for sharks in data-poor regions. The use for
scientific purposes of animals caught by artisanal
and commercial fishers can be an effective tool
for the analysis of fish distributions, including
those of elasmobranchs (Giareta et al. 2021). The
confirmed presence of C. leucas in the Musi
River indicates that juvenile and subadult bull
sharks utilize this river as a freshwater habitat,
presumably as a nursery area. This was already
suggested by previous records of C. leucas from
the Musi River, therefore fulfilling the repeated
use criterion for nursery areas as outlined by
Heupel et al. (2007). The present data suggests
that numerous river basins on Sumatra may be
utilized as nursery areas by immature bull sharks.
Present records from four rivers (Buluh, Asa-
han, Babalan, Indragiri), in addition to the Musi
and Batang Hari rivers, increase the number of
known Sumatran river basins with occurrences of
C. leucas to six. Moreover, our data show that the
rivers of Sumatra likely represent an important
habitat in the life-history of this species in the
area, and that they therefore require management
alongside the coastal areas of Indonesia. Catch
dates indicate that these Sumatran rivers are uti-
lized by immature C. leucas at least between
March and September (Table 1). Our results sug-
gest that additional river basins of Sumatra and
Indonesia may also function as nursery areas for
bull sharks, so future records of C. leucas from
Indonesian and adjacent river basins in Southeast
Asia can be expected.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the reviewers and editors for their
worthful comments and are grateful to the follow-
ing Sumatran fishers for reporting their catches of
Carcharhinus leucas: R. Puspita, R. Cenyo, D.
Warsa Ndut, M. Nur, D. Putrra, and T. Rismadi.
Forthermore, we are grateful to D. Whitmore for
the language editing.
REFERENCES
BOESEMAN M. 1964. Notes on the fishes of west-
ern New Guinea III. The freshwater shark of
Jamoer Lake. Zool Meded.40 (3): 9-22.
COMPAGNO LJV. 1984. FAO species catalogue.
Vol. 4. Sharks of the world: An annotated and
illustrated catalogue of shark species known to
date. Part 2. Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fish
Synop. 125 (4): 251-655.
EBERT DA, FOWLER SL, COMPAGNO LJV. 2013.
Sharks of the world: a fully illustrated guide.
Plymouth, UK: Wild Nature Press. 528 p.
EBERT DA, FOWLER SL, DANDO M. 2021. Sharks
of the world: a complete guide. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press. 624 p.
GARRICK JAF. 1982. Sharks of the genus Car-
charhinus. NOAA Tech Rep NMFS. 445: 1-194.
GAUSMANN P. 2021. Synopsis of global fresh and
brackish water occurrences of the bull shark
(Carcharhinus leucas Valenciennes 1839,
Carcharhinidae), with comments on distribu-
tion and habitat use. Integr Syst: Stuttgart
Contr Nat Hist. 4 (1): 55-213. DOI: https://
doi.org/10.18476/2021.423083
GIARETA EP, PRADO AC, LEITE RD, PADILHA É,
DOS SANTOS IH, WOSIAK CDCDL, WOSNICK
N. 2021. Fishermen’s participation in research
and conservation of coastal elasmobranchs.
Ocean Coast Manag. 199: 105421. DOI:
442 MARINE AND FISHERY SCIENCES 35 (3): 437-444 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105
41
GRANT MI, KYNE PM, SIMPFENDORFER CA,
WHITE WT, CHIN A. 2019. Categorising use
patterns of non-marine environments by elas-
mobranchs and a review of their extinction
risk. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 29: 689-710.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-019-09
576-w
HASAN V, SAMITRA D, WIDODO MS, GAUSMANN P.
2021. A new inland record of the bull shark
Carcharhinus leucas (Müller & Henle 1839)
from Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malays. 50
(10): 3153-3158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17
576/jsm-2021-5010-26
HEUPEL MR, CARLSON JR, SIMPFENDORFER CA.
2007. Shark nursery areas: concepts, defini-
tion, characterization and assumptions. Mar
Ecol Prog Ser. 337: 287-297. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.3354/MEPS337287
HEUPEL MR, SIMPFENDORFER CA. 2011. Estuar-
ine nursery areas provide a low-mortality
environment for young bull sharks Carcharhi-
nus leucas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 433: 237-244.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/MEPS09191
IQBAL M, NURNAWATI E, SETIAWAN A, DAHLAN Z,
YUSTIAN I. 2019. First photographic inland
records of bull shark Carcharhinus leucas
(Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) in Su-
matran waters, Indonesia. Ecol Montenegrina.
22: 171-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37828/
em.2019.22.14
JAITEH VF, HORDYK AR, BRACCINI M, WARREN C,
LONERAGAN NR. 2017. Shark finning in east-
ern Indonesia: assessing the sustainability of a
data-poor fishery. ICES J Mar Sci. 74 (1):
242-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms
%2Ffsw170
KOTTELAT M. 2013. The fishes of the inland
waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core
bibliography of the fishes known to occur in
freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles
Bull Zool. 27: 1-663.
LAST PR, STEVENS JD. 2009. Sharks and rays of
Autralia. 2nd ed. Collingwood: CSIRO Pub-
lishing Australia. 644 p.
MATICH P, HEITHAUS MR. 2015. Individual varia-
tion in ontogenetic niche shifts in habitat use
and movement patterns of a large estuarine
predator (Carcharhinus leucas). Oecologia
178: 347-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s
00442015-3253-2
MCCORD ME, LAMBERTH SJ. 2009. Catching and
tracking the world’s largest Zambezi (bull)
shark Carcharhinus leucas in the Breede estu-
ary, South Africa: the first 43 hours. Afr J Mar
Sci. 31 (1): 107-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.
2989/AJMS.2009.31.1.11.782
PILLANS RD, FRY GC, STEVEN ADL, PATTERSON
T. 2020. Environmental influences on long-
term movement patterns of a euryhaline elas-
mobranch (Carcharhinus leucas) within a
subtropical estuary. Estuaries Coast. 43: 2152-
2169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-02
0-00755-8
PILLANS RD, GOOD JP, ANDERSON WG, HAZON N,
FRANKLIN CE. 2005. Freshwater to seawater
acclimation of juvenile bull sharks (Car-
charhinus leucas): plasma osmolytes and
Na+/K+‒ATPase activity in gill, rectal gland,
kidney and intestine. J Comp Physiol. B 175:
37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-
004-0460-2
PILLANS RD, STEVENS JD, KYNE PM, SALINI J.
2009. Observations on the distribution, biolo-
gy, short-term movements and habitat require-
ments of river sharks Glyphis spp. in northern
Australia. Endanger Species Res. 10: 321-332.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/ESR00206
RIGBY CL, ESPINOZA M, DERRICK D, PACOUREAU
N, DICKEN M. 2021. Carcharhinus leucas. The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021:
e.T39372A2910670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.
2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T39372A2910
670.en
THORSON TB. 1972. The status of the bull shark,
Carcharhinus leucas, in the Amazon River.
Copeia. 1972 (3): 601-605. DOI: https://doi.
443
GAUSMANN AND HASAN: NEW INLAND RECORDS OF THE BULL SHARK FROM SUMATRA
org/10.2307/1442947
THORSON TB. 1976. The status of the Lake
Nicaragua shark: an updated appraisal. In:
THORSON TB, editor. Investigations of the
ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan lakes. Lincoln:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln. p. 561-574.
[accessed 2022 May 25]. https://digitalcom
mons.unl.edu/ichthynicar/41.
WINTNER SP, DUDLEY SFJ, KISTNASAMY, N, EVE-
RETT, B. 2002. Age and growth estimates for
the Zambezi shark, Carcharhinus leucas, from
the east coast of South Africa. Mar Freshwater
Res. 53 (2): 557-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.
1071/MF01062
444 MARINE AND FISHERY SCIENCES 35 (3): 437-444 (2022)